Huge Powerball jackpots attract 'everyone,' but there's a catchNew Foto - Huge Powerball jackpots attract 'everyone,' but there's a catch

Americans from all backgrounds put up hard-earned money for achance to win the Powerball– especially when jackpots hit eye-popping figures – but gambling most negatively impacts low-income households, experts told USA TODAY. "There's no group that really doesn't play the lottery, but they play at different rates," said David Just, a Cornell University economics professor. Across socio-economic lines, both the rich and the poor participate inthe lotterybut lower-income groups play at higher rates than wealthier individuals – and they spend higher percentages of their income on lottery games, research shows. Federal sales data indicates the lottery is most popular in the Northeast, including in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. The lottery also sees higher rates of play during times of economic turmoil, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, fitting other known gambling trends that correlate financial blows to increased risk taking. But that all changes, however, as the jackpot grows and the lottery turns into a social event. Such is the case with the current$1.8 billion jackpot, the second-largest in U.S. history. As the grand prize has climbed, so too has the number of participants forking over $2 per ticket for a chance to win the life-altering jackpot. For the Sept. 3 drawing, there were 162 million Powerball tickets sold nationwide, a 189% increase in sales compared to the previous week's drawing, according to the Multi-State Lottery Association. "At the billion-dollar mark, the lottery starts to bring everyone in – the convenience store worker, the teacher, the doctor, the lawyer, the internet billionaire," said Victor Matheson, an economics professor at College of the Holy Cross who has studied the lottery and other forms of gambling for decades. More:Want to win that huge Powerball jackpot? Here's updates on everything to know. In 2023, Americans spent over $103 million on the lottery nationwide, including the Powerball, according to statistics from the U.S. Census Bureau. The states in which people spent the most money on the lottery have the largest populations ‒ New York, California, Texas, Florida. But when lottery sales are calculated per capita, Massachusetts leads the pack, with the average adult spending nearly $900 a year on lottery games. "The average spendings on the lottery is astounding, especially in Massachusetts," said Just. "It sort of makes your jaw drop when you first see it." Experts said more research needs to be done to determine exactly why northeastern states see such high rates of lottery engagement, but possible factors include higher levels of disposable income and more urban settings that make it easier to purchase lottery games in person, Matheson said. Just and Matheson both pointed to the statistic that the average adult spends about $400 a year on lottery games. While the spending is fairly even across socio-economic lines, it has a disproportionate impact on low-income families that could otherwise use those funds for necessities or to build savings. "That's pretty significant when you're talking about households in the bottom fifth of incomes, making about $40,000 per year," Matheson said. State lotteries have also faced fierce criticism for selling more to low-income communities and transferring wealth out of those areas to more affluent school districts through scholarships and other lottery-funded programs. A2022 study by the Howard Center for Investigative Journalismfound that stores selling lottery tickets are disproportionately clustered in lower-income communities, and that people who patronize those retailers live in the same areas. State-sanctioned reports and studies have found that scratch-offs are the highest-earning lottery games, and a small segment of habitual players account for most of the spending. These players were disproportionately Black, Hispanic, lower-income and non-high school graduates, the Howard Center found in its analysis of other reports and statewide studies. Matheson referenced these findings and said scratch-offs are "disproportionally purchased by the poor." But, he added, as prizes reach into the multi-million and billion dollar range, participation from high-income households begins to climb. Research suggests that habitual lottery players – especially those with low incomes – see the gamble as an investment rather than a form of entertainment. "It's something that provides hope for those who are desperate," Just said. "It may be a false hope, but it's what they have." This view can be exacerbated by hard times. Just said research has found correlations between economic downturns and increased participation in the lottery. He pointed to the height of the pandemic, when multiple states saw major increases in the amount of money people were spending on the lottery. South Carolina, for example,saw a $300 million or almost 19% surge in lottery saleswhen compared with 2019. It depends. Will it be a lighthearted purchase so you can be a part of a national event, or is it a desperate attempt to recoup lost money? Will buying a lottery ticket eat up a noticeable portion of your income? Do you have an emergency fund? Experts say these questions are essential in determining whether you have a healthy view of the lottery. The lottery, including the Powerball, should be seen as an entertainment product – not an investment, experts say. That's because your estimated chances of winning the jackpot are about 1 in 292 million. It can alsoworsen your mental health, especially if you're spending money you can't afford to lose. "$2 is a low price to pay to dream about being a billionaire – that's true," said Matheson. "But as an investment, it's terrible." If you or someone you know is struggling with gambling, call or text 1-800-GAMBLER, operated by theNational Council on Problem Gambling. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Huge Powerball jackpots attract 'everyone.' Is it worth the risk?

Huge Powerball jackpots attract 'everyone,' but there's a catch

Huge Powerball jackpots attract 'everyone,' but there's a catch Americans from all backgrounds put up hard-earned money for acha...
Israel orders evacuation of Gaza City as Trump says U.S. in 'deep negotiations' with HamasNew Foto - Israel orders evacuation of Gaza City as Trump says U.S. in 'deep negotiations' with Hamas

The Israeli militaryhas ordered residents of Gaza City to evacuate to a designated "humanitarian zone" as its forces press deeper into the city, intensifyinga major offensiveaimed at seizing control of the area. The announcement came afterPresident Donald Trump saidFriday that the U.S. was in "very deep" negotiations with Hamas, who had earlier released a video showing two Israeli hostages seized from a music festival duringthe Oct. 7, 2023 terrorist attacks. Addressing residents on X Saturday,Israel Defense Forcesspokesperson Avichay Adraee urged civilians to move from Gaza City in the north to the Al-Mawasi safe zone, a coastal area in the southern city of Khan Younis. There, he said, they would find "food supplies, tents, medicines, and medical materials." In a separate post, he pressed "residents of Gaza" to leave early "and join the thousands who have already relocated there in the past days and weeks." The IDF have been carrying out heavy strikes on Gaza City for weeks, advancing through northern suburbs to within a few miles of its center. On Friday its forcesdestroyed a high-risetower in a densely populated part of the city. The IDF said it warned civilians beforehand and — without providing evidence — that it was being used by Hamas. Footage showed Palestinians running for safety as the building collapsed within seconds of it being hit. The Mushtaha Tower's management said it was being used for displaced people and denied it had been used for anything other than civilian purposes. The assault on Gaza City — declared a "dangerous combat zone" by Israel — is expected to displace hundreds of thousands of people, most of them already uprooted multiple times during the war. Aid groups warn the offensive could deepen the humanitarian catastrophe in the enclave and has already drawn international condemnation. The world'sleading body on hunger declared faminein Gaza for the first time last month. Israeli has denied reports of growing starvation in the enclave. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katzsaid Friday that "the lock has been lifted from the gates of hell in Gaza," adding: "When the door opens, it will not close." His comments came after an Israeli military spokesman said Thursday that it now controls about 40% of the city, where about one million people lived prior to the war. The military controls about 75% of Gaza. Israel launched its military campaign after the Hamas-led terror attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, which saw 1,200 people killed and around 250 people taken hostage. Since then, Palestinian health officials say, more than 64,000 people have been killed in Gaza, including thousands of children, while much of the enclave has been reduced to rubble. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described Gaza City as Hamas's last bastion, and ordered the military to seize the enclave's largest urban hub. He has also pushed for an all-or-nothing deal that would see all of the hostages released at once and Hamas surrendering. Hamas released a video Friday of two Israeli hostages taken on Oct 7. 2023, and one said he was being held in Gaza City. Guy Gilboa-Dalal and Alon Ohel are two of 48 people still being held by Hamas in Gaza,with 20 thought to be still alive. Gilboa-Dalal, looking exhausted, spoke for about three-and-a-half minutes, saying he was being held in Gaza City with other captives and feared being killed in Israel's assault. Some of the footage was taken in a car in a video dated August 28. NBC News could not independently verify when it was recorded. Ohel is also seen briefly in the footage. Elsewhere Trump told reporters Friday that Washington was in "very deep" negotiations with Hamas, but that the situation would become "tough" and "nasty" if Hamas did not release all the hostages. "We said let them all out, right now let them all out. And much better things will happen for them but if you don't let them all out, it's going to be a tough situation, it's going to be nasty," Trump said, adding that Hamas was "asking for some things that are fine," without elaborating.

Israel orders evacuation of Gaza City as Trump says U.S. in 'deep negotiations' with Hamas

Israel orders evacuation of Gaza City as Trump says U.S. in 'deep negotiations' with Hamas The Israeli militaryhas ordered residents...
Epstein survivors join hands, Google dodges breakup, Belichick bombs: Week in reviewNew Foto - Epstein survivors join hands, Google dodges breakup, Belichick bombs: Week in review

Women who said they survived sexual abuse at the hands of Jeffrey Epsteingathered outside the U.S. Capitolfor an emotional rally to demandfull transparency in the case. One accuser, Marina Lacerda, called on the Justice Department to give survivors full unredacted copies of all case files. "I never thought I would find myself here," she said. "The only reason I am here is because it feels like the people who matter in this country finally care about what we have to say." A day earlier,Rep. Nancy Mace, herself a survivor of sexual assault, left a private meeting of lawmakers and Epstein accusers in tears after hearing victims' stories. The U.S. Space Command will have a new home:Huntsville, Alabama, already no stranger to giant leaps in spaceflight. Headquarters for the command, which is responsible for military operations in space, will be relocated from Colorado, PresidentDonald Trumpannounced, ending a yearslong political turf battle for bragging rights, not to mention tens of thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in investment. Huntsville, Alabama's largest city,has long been synonymous with the U.S. space program; it was there that rockets were developed that launched the first U.S. satellite into orbit and sent men to the moon. Its nickname in those heady days: "Rocket City." 'We were losing the race in space':Watch President Trump's announcement Google has dodged a bullet. The tech giant will not have to sell off its popular Chrome web browser or its Android operating system, a federal judge ruled in a landmark antitrust case brought by the U.S. Justice Department, but it will have to share some of its search data with its rivals. The decision, the first in a series of antitrust cases seeking to limit the power of tech corporations, comes after Judge Amit Mehta ruled last year that Google held an illegal monopoly by paying Apple and other tech companies billions of dollars a year to feature Google as the default search engine on their devices. Fashionistas can stop speculating: Chloe Malle is thenew editor-in-chief of Vogue magazine. She steps in for the iconic Anna Wintour – said to be the inspiration for the tyrannical boss in"The Devil Wears Prada"– who will stay on as Vogue's global editorial director. Wintour, 75, announced in June that she would be stepping aside after 37 years at the helm. "I know some people who were interested in this job were sort of daunted by the idea of Anna being down the hall," Malle told The New York Times. "I'm very happy she's down the hall with her Clarice Cliff pottery." Malle, 39, also isthe daughter of actress Candice Bergen− who once played a Vogue editor on "Sex and the City." Anna Wintour in photos:Follow the fashion icon's career and style Bill Belichick's college football debutat UNC had all the air of a celebration − and then the air was sucked out of sold-out Kenan Stadium faster than from a deflating Tom Brady football. Belichick'sTar Heelsscored on their opening possession in a Labor Day prime-time matchup with TCU, only to see the Horned Frogs score the next 41 points ina 48-14 blowoutas the six-time Super Bowl winner watched with blank stares and Carolina fans began heading for the exit ramps early. Said Belichick after the debacle: "I know we're a lot better than that." Next up for UNC: the Charlotte 49ers.− Compiled and written by Robert Abitbol This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Epstein survivors join hands, Google dodges breakup: Week in review

Epstein survivors join hands, Google dodges breakup, Belichick bombs: Week in review

Epstein survivors join hands, Google dodges breakup, Belichick bombs: Week in review Women who said they survived sexual abuse at the hands ...
An NFL-style Army selection program blocked favoritism. Hegseth called it 'woke'New Foto - An NFL-style Army selection program blocked favoritism. Hegseth called it 'woke'

An Army program for selecting unit commanders that a spokesman for SecretaryPete Hegsethcondemned as "woke" selected white men for command roles at a higher rate than women and minority officers, according to internal data reviewed by USA TODAY,Last year, it thwarted a four-star general's attempt to boost an unfit subordinate. The Army'sCommand Assessment Program, known as CAP, screened officers for career-defining command jobs by combining a series of physical and mental tests with feedback from previous peers and subordinates. It existed independent of the service's promotion system. But Hegseth directed the program's cancellation, celebrating the move ina Sept. 3 social media postsaying, "Good riddance." Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson, in a statement to USA TODAY, said Hegseth alone ordered the move "because it was a failed, woke experiment." More:Hegseth shuts down NFL-style 'crown jewel' of Army's merit-based talent programs "Secretary Hegseth has been clear: promotions across theDepartment of Warwill be based on merit and performance, not trendy social fads," Wilson added. "The Department's priority is building a lethal, effective military where leadership is earned, not handed out through flawed programs." The CAP program was considered a "crown jewel" of the Army's talent management reforms, said Mike Arnold, a fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution think tank and former deputy director of the Army Talent Management Task Force. CAP was designed to resemble how elite special operations units identify their members and leaders. When the CAP pilot began in 2019 during PresidentDonald Trump's first administration, Army leaders celebrated the departure from the service's 70s-vintage practice of relying only on hurried paper-based personnel file reviews to pick key commanders. More:Trump signs order renaming Department of Defense the Department of War "No longer will we spend weeks selecting a private for the Ranger Regiment", a special operations unit, "while spending an average of two minutes to select battalion commanders," said now-retired Gen. James McConville, then the service's chief of staff, ina 2019 article. At the multi-day NFL Combine-style event, hopeful commanders had to pass fitness and body fat testing before undergoing psychological evaluation. An interview panel of senior officers would weigh those results and a candidate's verbal and written communication abilities before voting on their fitness for demanding command roles. After passing, an officer's ranking for command assignment was calculated from their CAP performance and their Army personnel file. The Army will now return to its paper-based model of command selection, where a board of officers rapidly reviews a candidate's personnel file. That model, according to Arnold, "is based almost solely on subjective (performance) evaluations about the length of a tweet." CAP's "double-blind" method of hiding a candidate's identity from the senior officer panel voting on their file removed race from consideration. Yet White men had the highest pass rate in the program, according to program data reviewed by USA TODAY. Women and minority officers were more likely to be found "not yet certified for command." "CAP is (designed) to reduce bias for everybody, not just ... for minorities," said Arnold. "It is intentionally designed to select the very best leader with as little bias as possible." CAP also resisted an attempt by then-Gen. Charles Hamilton to interfere in the selection process for his former assistant, a Black female subordinate, in early 2024. The Army's inspector general found that Hamilton had improperly manipulated her performance records through a fudged evaluation and multiple prestigious awards, "strengthening her file for command consideration." In a paper board review, the officer's file looked stellar: it earned 63 points out of a total of 66, according tothe IG report. But CAP found her unfit: her score at the event put her in the 1st percentile, meaning she scored worse than 99% of participants. The interview board, according to the inspector general's report, unanimously ruled she was not ready for command due to a poor operational psychology assessment and low leadership and strategic thinking ability. Her peer and subordinate evaluations were mixed. Hamilton attempted to pressure CAP to change its assessment, the IG report said; a second interview panel also found the officer not ready for command. He ultimately circumvented the CAP system to secure a policy exemption from Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George for the officer to be placed on the command list. (Hamilton did not respond to an inquiry from USA TODAY.) When Military.com, a military-focused news publication, published an investigation based on a memo written by CAP's director documenting Hamilton's interference, the Army placed him under investigation. He ultimately was fired and demoted to lieutenant general upon retirement. The officer Hamilton had attempted to assist was removed from the battalion command list. In a letter to then-Army Secretary Christine Wormuth asking for reinstatement that was seen by USA TODAY, Hamilton said he intervened because of CAP's "disparate impact on Black officers." Wormuth made CAP a permanent program after the Hamilton affair concluded in the final months of the Biden administration. The directive establishing the program made it more difficult for generals, regardless of their motivations, to put their thumbs on the scale in the future by circumventing the system as Hamilton had. Army spokesperson Maj. Travis Shaw told USA TODAY that CAP's cancellation was ordered in line with an ongoing Pentagon review of officer promotion and selection policy. Hegseth named Stuart Scheller as the lead official for the officer policy review in a June social media video. Scheller is an ex-Marine officer who was fired from battalion command and convicted by a military court on charges stemming from social media videos he made demanding accountability for senior military and civilian leaders during the chaotic 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal. The former lieutenant colonel, once viewed asa rising starin the Corps, became a conservative favorite for his statements. Republican figures including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and then-Rep. Louie Gohmerttestified as character witnessesat his trial, which devolved into a partisan sideshow. In a social media post announcing his hiring at the Pentagon, Scheller said he was excited to study how the military can create more "competition" in its leadership selection processes. Wilson, the Pentagon press secretary, said that Scheller had nothing to do with the decision to end CAP. "The decision to eliminate the Army's Command Assessment Program was made solely by the Secretary of Defense ... well before (Scheller) arrived at the Pentagon," Wilson said. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:White male Army officers excelled in 'woke' NFL-style assessment

An NFL-style Army selection program blocked favoritism. Hegseth called it 'woke'

An NFL-style Army selection program blocked favoritism. Hegseth called it 'woke' An Army program for selecting unit commanders that ...
Once these recruits couldn't make the cut. Now they make up a quarter of Army troops.New Foto - Once these recruits couldn't make the cut. Now they make up a quarter of Army troops.

FORT JACKSON, SC – Every Tuesday before dawn,hundreds of hopefuls line upwith exposed midriffs to be weighed and measured at thisSouth Carolina Army base, which takes in more recruits than any other. For course trainees, a drop in body fat could mean shipping out to begin a career in the Army within days. Otherwise, these future soldiers are consigned to another week working off the pounds. Anticipation and anxiety pervade as they file one by one past a desk where a drill sergeant informs each one of their fate. Some cheer for joy. Others wipe away tears. Trainees like these, who wouldn't have made the cut due to poor test scores or struggles with pushups a decade ago, now make up nearly one quarter of the U.S. Army's new recruits. For Briana Flowers, 21, a 2-inch decrease in her waistline meant she would be en route to Army basic training within days. Leaving the line, she gushed about plans to indulge in the dining hall's French toast at breakfast and to break the good news to her mother. "It's exhilarating," she said. "It's all I've wanted." USA TODAY spent three days with prospective soldiers and drill sergeants to get a firsthand look at a key weapon in the Army's effort to defeat a recruiting crisis. TheFuture Soldier Preparatory Courseaims to bring young people with academic and fitness challenges up to military standards. While the program has helped the Army meet its recruiting goals, it has raised questions about the quality of soldiers it is producing. More:Report: UFC event at White House to feature weigh-ins at Lincoln Memorial In 2022, as years of shortfall in recruiting numbers compounded into a crisis, the Army test-launched the Future Soldier prep course, a boot camp-style program to quickly pull up recruits who don't meet academic or physical standards. That year, the Army's recruiting class had been 25% shy of its goal of 60,000 new soldiers. Three years later, with the Army's recruitment crisis in the rearview mirror, Defense SecretaryPete Hegsethand others say young people are clamoring to serve under PresidentDonald Trump. The fledgling Future Soldier prep course started during Joe Biden's presidency and has played a central role in reversing the recruiting slump. More than 46,000 soldiers have joined the Army through the Future Soldier prep course. It has produced between 20% and 24% of the Army's newly minted soldiers since the course's launch in 2023. Would-be soldiers in the program sleep in large, open bays on bunk beds. At meals, they stock up on grilled chicken, cottage cheese and vegetables as drill sergeants monitor their trays. Program leaders underscored that trainees are never ordered to put food back. They aim to avoid disordered eating behaviors. The Army barelyclinchedits recruiting goal of 55,000 in the last fiscal year. This year, itannounced in June–four months early – that it had met its annual goal of 61,000 signed contracts. Hegseth has accused the military of lowering standards in the past and vowed to raise fighting standards. The Future Soldier prep course has not fallen afoul of the administration's anti-DEI agenda thus far. "You need to be fit, not fat. Sharp, not shabby," Hegseth told the Army War Collegein an April speech. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll said in an interview this summer that the course helps the Army maintain standards, not lower them. "Every one of those soldiers that has come out of the Future Soldier prep course has met that standard without us lowering it," he said. The course accepts recruits whose body fat is up to 8% higher or whose scores on the Army's aptitude test are as much as seven points lower than the requirement to become a soldier. In the span of 90 days, they work intensively to bring down their body fat or bring up their academic scores, testing every week until they succeed. If they fail, they can try again after six months. Getting recruits up to standard isn't cheap. The Army will spend about $120 million this year and about $99 million in 2026 in this effort to fill its ranks. Not all recruitment is equal, and the "quality" of recruits, or how high they score on the Army's aptitude test, can have implications for the military's level of readiness, according to Beth Asch, a military recruitment and personnel expert at the RAND Corporation. Trainees who need academic help make up around 70% of the Future Soldier prep course. Trainees on the academic track attend high school-like classes in math and word comprehension from around 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. daily. At a session in August, a teacher methodically jotted down equations with complex fractions on a whiteboard as trainees rhythmically recited aloud the steps of the process: convert to an improper fraction, add across the top, divide by the denominator. More:Breathing, yoga, and healthy boundaries: Why the Army is taking a new training approach Pentagon policy refers to "benchmarks" for quality that require at least 90% of recruits to have a high school diploma. Recruits with the lowest scores on the military's aptitude test are assigned to what is known as Category 4. Recruits with test scores in the middle 61% fall into Categories 2 and 3, while the top 6% fall into Category 1. Category 4 recruits can make up no more than 4% of new troops. Each is required to attend the prep course, according to the Army, and about 90% of them become soldiers. The Army has been brushing up against the Category 4 limit since the recruiting crisis began. Data shows that the percentage of Category 4 recruits jumped from 2% in 2020 to 3.7% in 2021 and peaked at 3.9% in 2022, the year the pilot program for future soldiers debuted. In 2023, the figure was 3.56%; it dropped to 3.46% in 2024; and by July 2025, it stood at 3.72%. Research suggests that soldiers with higher aptitude scores "perform better on hands-on military tasks," and have "fewer behavioral and disciplinary issues," Asch said. However, data also shows that course graduates have performed equally or better early in their Army careers than those who joined the service through the traditional route, according to Lt. Gen. Brian Eifler, the Army's top officer for personnel. He attributed that difference to the fact that soldiers in the prep course get a head start in what amounted to "pre-basic training." Attrition rates for preparatory course candidates are similar to the rates of their peers who join the Army through the traditional route, according to the Army. More than 90% of those who sign up for the courses end up in the Army. Soldiers on the academic improvement track have performed slightly better than soldiers in the body fat reduction track. "The way they would hold themselves compared to the other trainees... you can totally tell the difference between them," said Drill Sgt. Jenette Paschke, who previously worked with soldiers at the beginning of their Army training, before her work with the course at Fort Jackson. "They had struggled more... but they still strived to be better." "They have grit, and I think that's what the Army needs." The courses, Eifler said, have provided a "nudge" for young people who want to serve. "If I didn't have the opportunity, I don't know where I would be right now," said Kyleigh Wainwright, a 23-year-old specialist stationed at Fort Hood who entered the Army through the program. Growing up on a small family farm in New York, Wainwright was accustomed to physical work and lifting heavy weights, but her endurance was "poor," she said. She lost a small amount of body fat over a week doing the course's intensive workouts before testing out to begin basic training. Nathaneal Aubin, 26, said after he dropped from 265 to 240 pounds. Now a private first class stationed at Camp Buehring in Kuwait, Aubin still struggles with his weight and staying within the Army's body fat requirements. Aubin entered the 101st Airborne Division as a helicopter maintainer less than two years ago with dreams of becoming a pilot. As the end of his contract approaches, Aubin, who is from rural Connecticut, said he's still mulling whether to stay in the Army or pursue his goals outside it as an aviator. "I lost my path a bit," he said. Wainwright said there's still some social stigma within the Army's ranks attached to the course, which she said is colloquially called Army "fat camp" – sometimes by the trainees themselves. "It's a little bit humiliating," she said. Months ago, the Army was forced to answer to a report from the Defense Department Inspector General, an internal but independent watchdog, which found that the program was admitting trainees with a body fat percentage far above its stated cap, as much as 19% higher than the requirement to begin Army basic training. Data showed that 14% of trainees above the body mass threshold were taking up the program's "limited medical resources," leaving the rest at increased health risk, "including the risk of death," according to the report. The program's academic component had also let its stated standards slide, and "a significant portion" of its Fort Jackson trainees "had difficulty speaking or understanding English," the watchdog found. A "sizable" but "not significant" portion of academic trainees didn't speak English as their first language, according to Capt. Matthew Lugowski, the course commander. Some in the course still couldn't speak "a lick" of English, he said. The Army largely disputed those critiques, saying it already had a stringent process in place to weed out trainees who don't meet requirements. In a room at Fort Jackson next to the paved outdoor area where trainees strain through sweaty workouts, one wall is covered in scribbled-on sticky notes. Its official name – the Why Wall. Trainees' messages on those notes say "free college", "get me and my kids out of a bad situation", "to make my family proud" and "I needed money and couldn't find a job." "I'm not a failure," another note read. For many hopefuls at Fort Jackson, the "why" is rooted in the struggles they left behind at home – poverty, homelessness, sexual assault and the loss of loved ones. "My mom worked three jobs, and I still send money back to help pay bills," said Diego Gutierrez Serrano, 18, who grew up in a small town outside Worcester, Massachusetts. He saw the program as a path out of poverty and a way to avoid becoming "another statistic like all the other kids." Lea Creech, 22, of Milford, Ohio, said she was the victim of sexual assault, a traumatic experience that led her to sign up for the course. "I wanted to not only get my history back, but get my body," she said. "Making sure I'm proud of myself every day," she said, tearing up. "That's why I'm here." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:How the Army intensified recruiting, through math drills and push-ups

Once these recruits couldn't make the cut. Now they make up a quarter of Army troops.

Once these recruits couldn't make the cut. Now they make up a quarter of Army troops. FORT JACKSON, SC – Every Tuesday before dawn,hundr...

 

GRIF MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com